Members may download one copy of our sample forms and templates for your personal use within your organization. Please note that all such forms and policies should be reviewed by your legal counsel for compliance with applicable law, and should be modified to suit your organization’s culture, industry, and practices. Neither members nor non-members may reproduce such samples in any other way (e.g., to republish in a book or use for a commercial purpose) without SHRM’s permission. To request permission for specific items, click on the “reuse permissions” button on the page where you find the item.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 and the Equal Pay Act of 1963 prohibit wage discrimination in the workplace. Jobs that have the same functions and similar working conditions and that require substantially the same skills must be compensated equally with allowable variations based on experience, qualifications, seniority, geographic location and performance.
As policymakers address pay equity, one challenge is understanding how much of the pay disparity between groups is attributable to discrimination, legitimate pay practices or other workplace dynamics, as well as what policy changes might help address it.
The Paycheck Fairness Act would prohibit employers' ability to base employee pay differentials on experience, qualifications, geographic location and performance and would shift the burden of proof, making it easier for plaintiffs to challenge employer pay practices.
Additionally, California, Delaware, Oregon and Massachusetts, as well as a growing number of cities and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, have passed some form of pay-equity legislation. Many include a prohibition on asking about a job candidate's salary history. Some include a concept that appears close to or approaching "comparable worth," which requires that jobs with comparable skills and responsibilities or that are of comparable worth to the employer be paid the same. Another emerging trend is the inclusion of a safe harbor for employers that conduct voluntary self-evaluations of pay and are actively working to address any discrepancies.
SHRM believes that pay decisions should be made based on bona fide business factors and not based on non-job-related characteristics. Any improper pay disparities should be promptly addressed.
SHRM supports public-policy efforts that foster a single standard for establishing pay equity, rather than navigating different standards at the federal, state and local levels.
SHRM advocates for a federal standard of equal pay for equal work and opposes efforts to equate different jobs using "similarly situated" or "comparable worth" standards.
SHRM encourages employers to educate applicants or employees on their compensation practices by sharing compensation for the position, total compensation philosophy, pay structure and the factors taken into consideration in pay decisions.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in as a SHRM member.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
HR People + Strategy provides content as a service to its readers and members. It does not offer legal advice, and cannot guarantee the accuracy